<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for RMPS revision</title>
	<atom:link href="http://edubuzz.org/jburt/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://edubuzz.org/jburt</link>
	<description>A site for Scottish students of Religious, Moral and Philosophical Studies (Philosophy too).</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 09:41:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter&#8230; and Spring &#8211; your reviews 2013! by ellaandhollyarecoolas</title>
		<link>http://edubuzz.org/jburt/2013/06/12/spring-summer-fall-winter-and-spring-your-reviews-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-1443</link>
		<dc:creator>ellaandhollyarecoolas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 09:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edubuzz.org/jburt/?p=1548#comment-1443</guid>
		<description>Spring, Summer, Autumn, Winter... and Spring

Film Review

This movie is about an old monk lives in a small floating temple on an isolated lake. The wise master has also a young boy with him who learns to become a monk. And we watch them learn as the different seasons and years pass by.

My personal opinion on this film is that it’s interesting and has the ability to allow the audience to learn and explore the culture of Buddhism. I found that parts of this film were confusing and told in the wrong way. However, in hindsight I realise the director’s view.

Throughout the film, the audience are never told any names of the buddhist characters. There is even one woman who never reveals her face. This is because in buddhism it is believed that one of the goals of enlightenment is the extinction of the self. However, the only character’s name that are revealed are the police that arrest the monk. These men are the only non-buddhist characters in the film.

The first buddhist reference was karma, when the young monk committed a bad action leading to bad karma. Consequently, he was made to suffer his bad actions himself. When suffering the action he placed upon the animals, the young monk found out the consequences of his action on the fish and snake. While coming to terms with the consequences of what he had done, the young monk becomes aware or Dukka (everything is suffering) and Anicca (impermanence).

In Buddhism, the snake symbolises hatred. This is used multiple times in this film. The scene where I think this is most meaningful is where the old monk/teacher commits suicide by burning the boat. The camera uses Mise En Scène and has a clip on the snake which symbolised the bad reincarnation of the Old Monk because of his bad karma. The audience know that it is the monk that will be reincarnated as the snake because the snake is viewed slithering over the monk’s clothes.

Parts of the Buddha’s body are also used as symbolism in the film. When the monk is asking for the Buddha’s forgiveness he carves out the Buddha’s head in ice. This symbolises the monk’s desire for wisdom. The ill women often tapped the bowl when praying. This symbolises the woman depending on other to live because the bowl represents the BUddha’s simple life when he had to depend on others to live.

A very clear reference to Buddhism in the film is the 4 noble truths. When the young monk commits his bad acts he realises Dukka (everything is suffering). When the boy grows up he falls in love with the ill woman staying at the temple. This is when he realises Samudaya (suffering is caused by desire) and after he faces the consequences of being in love he tries to understand Nirrodha (stop desiring and you will stop suffering), This is shown when he cuts of his hair when he returns to the temple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spring, Summer, Autumn, Winter&#8230; and Spring</p>
<p>Film Review</p>
<p>This movie is about an old monk lives in a small floating temple on an isolated lake. The wise master has also a young boy with him who learns to become a monk. And we watch them learn as the different seasons and years pass by.</p>
<p>My personal opinion on this film is that it’s interesting and has the ability to allow the audience to learn and explore the culture of Buddhism. I found that parts of this film were confusing and told in the wrong way. However, in hindsight I realise the director’s view.</p>
<p>Throughout the film, the audience are never told any names of the buddhist characters. There is even one woman who never reveals her face. This is because in buddhism it is believed that one of the goals of enlightenment is the extinction of the self. However, the only character’s name that are revealed are the police that arrest the monk. These men are the only non-buddhist characters in the film.</p>
<p>The first buddhist reference was karma, when the young monk committed a bad action leading to bad karma. Consequently, he was made to suffer his bad actions himself. When suffering the action he placed upon the animals, the young monk found out the consequences of his action on the fish and snake. While coming to terms with the consequences of what he had done, the young monk becomes aware or Dukka (everything is suffering) and Anicca (impermanence).</p>
<p>In Buddhism, the snake symbolises hatred. This is used multiple times in this film. The scene where I think this is most meaningful is where the old monk/teacher commits suicide by burning the boat. The camera uses Mise En Scène and has a clip on the snake which symbolised the bad reincarnation of the Old Monk because of his bad karma. The audience know that it is the monk that will be reincarnated as the snake because the snake is viewed slithering over the monk’s clothes.</p>
<p>Parts of the Buddha’s body are also used as symbolism in the film. When the monk is asking for the Buddha’s forgiveness he carves out the Buddha’s head in ice. This symbolises the monk’s desire for wisdom. The ill women often tapped the bowl when praying. This symbolises the woman depending on other to live because the bowl represents the BUddha’s simple life when he had to depend on others to live.</p>
<p>A very clear reference to Buddhism in the film is the 4 noble truths. When the young monk commits his bad acts he realises Dukka (everything is suffering). When the boy grows up he falls in love with the ill woman staying at the temple. This is when he realises Samudaya (suffering is caused by desire) and after he faces the consequences of being in love he tries to understand Nirrodha (stop desiring and you will stop suffering), This is shown when he cuts of his hair when he returns to the temple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter&#8230; and Spring &#8211; your reviews 2013! by Calum Harris</title>
		<link>http://edubuzz.org/jburt/2013/06/12/spring-summer-fall-winter-and-spring-your-reviews-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-1442</link>
		<dc:creator>Calum Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 13:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edubuzz.org/jburt/?p=1548#comment-1442</guid>
		<description>Spring, Summer, Autumn, Winter...... and Spring Movie review

The film is about mainly a buddhist teacher and the boy who he teaches but it also shows other characters. The boy is very bad when he is young and is cruel to animals and sins when a girl comes. The boy is learning how to be a buddhist but when a sick girl his age comes he falls in love with her then runs away. Eventually he returns and the teacher finds out he has killed his wife and he makes him carve the buddhist sutra into wood in which the temple lies upon in the middle of a lake. The police come and let him finish his carving then they arrest him and take him away. The buddhist teacher then kills himself as he thinks he had been a bad teacher. After that we see another man come to the temple who we think is the boy from earlier in the film. A woman comes with a baby but after leaving it she tries to cross the lake but falls through the ice and dies. The man then ties a stone to himself then walks across the lake and up a mountain doing the same as the boy did to animals by tying stones to immobilise them on the way up. He then reaches the top and puts a statue of the Buddha on top of the mountain. We then see another teacher at the temple with a young boy who then begins to torment a tortoise, the film then finishes on the teacher and the boy rowing across the lake.

The film explores many key issues and points of buddhism throughout starting off with very simple things such as snakes being present throughout the film. Suffering is another important theme of buddhism which is present throughout such as when the boy ties rocks to the fish, the frog and the snake so that they can barely move. Following this his teacher tells him off and when he goes back the snake and the fish are dead and the boy is very upset and this is the bad karma being shown. His teacher teaches him a lesson by tying a rock to the boy so he feels the pain of the animals while he is going to see if they are alive. This scene also shows attachment as the boy cries when the animals are dead because he became attached.
When the girl comes to the temple the boy is very helpful and tries very hard to help her showing compassion and therefore skilful action but later they begin to sin by having sexual relations and the falling in love which again is attachment and not a skilful action. The teacher finds out but manages to get them to admit to it so they could learn which was a skilful action from the teacher. However the boy and girl run away which is a bad action as he rejects buddhism because he has become attached. We then find out he has killed the girl which is very bad karma and we see some foreshadowing as when they run away they take the cockerel which is the sign for delusion with them, maybe meaning that she did not truly love him and it was always going to happen.
When he comes back as a man he is still attached but cuts of his hair as an attempt to try and get back into buddhism. Later performs another un-skilful action as he tries to kill himself, his teacher then beats him to teach him, although it seems bad he actually has good intentions. By now he realises the first noble truth- Dukkha (everything is suffering) and he calms down and carves the sutra into the wood. Him loving her was desiring which started off all the suffering because of what the 4 noble truths says: everything is suffering, suffering is caused by desiring, to avoid suffering first you must avoid desiring, to do this follow the eightfold path.
After he has been arrested for murder the teacher kills himself as he believes he has been a bad teacher, he would think this is a skilful action as he does not want to teach others badly and get bad karma. This, along with the dying animals and the murder show impermanence and that nothing lasts forever. We see the snake going away from the burning teacher and go and rest upon his clothes which he laid upon the floor which symbolises reincarnation. The man at the end of the film takes the statue of the Buddha up the mountain and he does the same as what the boy at the beginning does with the animals by making them suffer while a song in the background says how he has left the secular world to return to the buddhist world and calls on old memories, so maybe it is the boy again and he is trying to fix all the bad things that he had done earlier in his life, I do not quite understand when he makes the animals suffer again but im sure there is something behind it.
The end of the film we see another child tormenting a tortoise showing suffering again. The film as a whole highlights many themes but mainly impermanence,suffering and desire. 
Overall I found the film interesting but quite dull at many parts but it tells us a lot about buddhism and helps me understand it more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spring, Summer, Autumn, Winter&#8230;&#8230; and Spring Movie review</p>
<p>The film is about mainly a buddhist teacher and the boy who he teaches but it also shows other characters. The boy is very bad when he is young and is cruel to animals and sins when a girl comes. The boy is learning how to be a buddhist but when a sick girl his age comes he falls in love with her then runs away. Eventually he returns and the teacher finds out he has killed his wife and he makes him carve the buddhist sutra into wood in which the temple lies upon in the middle of a lake. The police come and let him finish his carving then they arrest him and take him away. The buddhist teacher then kills himself as he thinks he had been a bad teacher. After that we see another man come to the temple who we think is the boy from earlier in the film. A woman comes with a baby but after leaving it she tries to cross the lake but falls through the ice and dies. The man then ties a stone to himself then walks across the lake and up a mountain doing the same as the boy did to animals by tying stones to immobilise them on the way up. He then reaches the top and puts a statue of the Buddha on top of the mountain. We then see another teacher at the temple with a young boy who then begins to torment a tortoise, the film then finishes on the teacher and the boy rowing across the lake.</p>
<p>The film explores many key issues and points of buddhism throughout starting off with very simple things such as snakes being present throughout the film. Suffering is another important theme of buddhism which is present throughout such as when the boy ties rocks to the fish, the frog and the snake so that they can barely move. Following this his teacher tells him off and when he goes back the snake and the fish are dead and the boy is very upset and this is the bad karma being shown. His teacher teaches him a lesson by tying a rock to the boy so he feels the pain of the animals while he is going to see if they are alive. This scene also shows attachment as the boy cries when the animals are dead because he became attached.<br />
When the girl comes to the temple the boy is very helpful and tries very hard to help her showing compassion and therefore skilful action but later they begin to sin by having sexual relations and the falling in love which again is attachment and not a skilful action. The teacher finds out but manages to get them to admit to it so they could learn which was a skilful action from the teacher. However the boy and girl run away which is a bad action as he rejects buddhism because he has become attached. We then find out he has killed the girl which is very bad karma and we see some foreshadowing as when they run away they take the cockerel which is the sign for delusion with them, maybe meaning that she did not truly love him and it was always going to happen.<br />
When he comes back as a man he is still attached but cuts of his hair as an attempt to try and get back into buddhism. Later performs another un-skilful action as he tries to kill himself, his teacher then beats him to teach him, although it seems bad he actually has good intentions. By now he realises the first noble truth- Dukkha (everything is suffering) and he calms down and carves the sutra into the wood. Him loving her was desiring which started off all the suffering because of what the 4 noble truths says: everything is suffering, suffering is caused by desiring, to avoid suffering first you must avoid desiring, to do this follow the eightfold path.<br />
After he has been arrested for murder the teacher kills himself as he believes he has been a bad teacher, he would think this is a skilful action as he does not want to teach others badly and get bad karma. This, along with the dying animals and the murder show impermanence and that nothing lasts forever. We see the snake going away from the burning teacher and go and rest upon his clothes which he laid upon the floor which symbolises reincarnation. The man at the end of the film takes the statue of the Buddha up the mountain and he does the same as what the boy at the beginning does with the animals by making them suffer while a song in the background says how he has left the secular world to return to the buddhist world and calls on old memories, so maybe it is the boy again and he is trying to fix all the bad things that he had done earlier in his life, I do not quite understand when he makes the animals suffer again but im sure there is something behind it.<br />
The end of the film we see another child tormenting a tortoise showing suffering again. The film as a whole highlights many themes but mainly impermanence,suffering and desire.<br />
Overall I found the film interesting but quite dull at many parts but it tells us a lot about buddhism and helps me understand it more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shooting Dogs / Beyond the Gates by Gary Cameron</title>
		<link>http://edubuzz.org/jburt/2013/05/01/shooting-dogs-beyond-the-gates/comment-page-1/#comment-1439</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 13:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edubuzz.org/jburt/?p=1546#comment-1439</guid>
		<description>The film made me rethink the way I view death, i saw it as way of in the distance and did not affect my life. But it is happening right now to people who don&#039;t deserve to die.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The film made me rethink the way I view death, i saw it as way of in the distance and did not affect my life. But it is happening right now to people who don&#8217;t deserve to die.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shooting Dogs / Beyond the Gates by CS</title>
		<link>http://edubuzz.org/jburt/2013/05/01/shooting-dogs-beyond-the-gates/comment-page-1/#comment-1437</link>
		<dc:creator>CS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 13:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edubuzz.org/jburt/?p=1546#comment-1437</guid>
		<description>The film was exciting, sad, interesting and effective. It triggered all emotions. Right from the start, all the little details, for example, the dog getting taken on the truck instead of the Tutsi, were very effective in putting across the horrible truth of the situation. It really made me think about the disgusting and terrible conditions in which the Tutsi had to live through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The film was exciting, sad, interesting and effective. It triggered all emotions. Right from the start, all the little details, for example, the dog getting taken on the truck instead of the Tutsi, were very effective in putting across the horrible truth of the situation. It really made me think about the disgusting and terrible conditions in which the Tutsi had to live through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shooting Dogs / Beyond the Gates by KF</title>
		<link>http://edubuzz.org/jburt/2013/05/01/shooting-dogs-beyond-the-gates/comment-page-1/#comment-1435</link>
		<dc:creator>KF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 12:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edubuzz.org/jburt/?p=1546#comment-1435</guid>
		<description>Insightful to the extreme genocide and the horrors of which these people faced. Horrifyingly graphic and depicts the massacre of the discriminative nature which grasped this country during this period. I found the film very emotive and felt pity for the tutsis and the distusting conditions they were forced to endure. The shooting the dogs scene it when the film, for me, moved me most. I found it shocking the inhumane conditions the tutsis were living in. The way the film was formed I found helped me empithise with them greatly and feeling disgusted for the hutu&#039;s and revolted that they were human. It reminded me of lord of the flies as in the sense that the camera captured the sense of mob mentality and hysteria spreading through the country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Insightful to the extreme genocide and the horrors of which these people faced. Horrifyingly graphic and depicts the massacre of the discriminative nature which grasped this country during this period. I found the film very emotive and felt pity for the tutsis and the distusting conditions they were forced to endure. The shooting the dogs scene it when the film, for me, moved me most. I found it shocking the inhumane conditions the tutsis were living in. The way the film was formed I found helped me empithise with them greatly and feeling disgusted for the hutu&#8217;s and revolted that they were human. It reminded me of lord of the flies as in the sense that the camera captured the sense of mob mentality and hysteria spreading through the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shooting Dogs / Beyond the Gates by BC</title>
		<link>http://edubuzz.org/jburt/2013/05/01/shooting-dogs-beyond-the-gates/comment-page-1/#comment-1433</link>
		<dc:creator>BC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 12:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edubuzz.org/jburt/?p=1546#comment-1433</guid>
		<description>I think that Shooting Dogs triggered me to feel four main emotions. The film made me feel guilty, disgusted, disturbed and ashamed that humans just the same as myself had to be put this amount of pain. The film put across a very strong point that all living people are the same no matter where they are from or what religion they follow. This was shown through the emotions it triggered in it&#039;s audience. The symbolism used where things such as the dogs being allowed on the French trucks but not the Tutsis whose lives where most in danger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Shooting Dogs triggered me to feel four main emotions. The film made me feel guilty, disgusted, disturbed and ashamed that humans just the same as myself had to be put this amount of pain. The film put across a very strong point that all living people are the same no matter where they are from or what religion they follow. This was shown through the emotions it triggered in it&#8217;s audience. The symbolism used where things such as the dogs being allowed on the French trucks but not the Tutsis whose lives where most in danger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shooting Dogs / Beyond the Gates by DC</title>
		<link>http://edubuzz.org/jburt/2013/05/01/shooting-dogs-beyond-the-gates/comment-page-1/#comment-1430</link>
		<dc:creator>DC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 12:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edubuzz.org/jburt/?p=1546#comment-1430</guid>
		<description>This film was very moving. The symbolism in the dogs was very powerful and emphasised the barbarity and cruelty of the situation that took place in Uganda. The fact it was historically accurate only made the film more prominent and upsetting in my mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This film was very moving. The symbolism in the dogs was very powerful and emphasised the barbarity and cruelty of the situation that took place in Uganda. The fact it was historically accurate only made the film more prominent and upsetting in my mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shooting Dogs / Beyond the Gates by Thompo</title>
		<link>http://edubuzz.org/jburt/2013/05/01/shooting-dogs-beyond-the-gates/comment-page-1/#comment-1427</link>
		<dc:creator>Thompo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 12:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edubuzz.org/jburt/?p=1546#comment-1427</guid>
		<description>Very powerful and triggered many emotions. The symbolism of the dog being more important than the Tutsi was shocking but very clever. Extremely brutal which helped convey the horror those people endured.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very powerful and triggered many emotions. The symbolism of the dog being more important than the Tutsi was shocking but very clever. Extremely brutal which helped convey the horror those people endured.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Diving Bell and the Butterfly by M.F</title>
		<link>http://edubuzz.org/jburt/2013/04/26/the-diving-bell-and-the-butterfly/comment-page-1/#comment-1426</link>
		<dc:creator>M.F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edubuzz.org/jburt/?p=1542#comment-1426</guid>
		<description>This is a very interesting film, and can be seen to represent a case of whether or not euthanasia should be legal. this is due to the fact that the movie tells the tale of Jean-Dominique Bauby who was once the editor of Elle magazine,but suffers a stroke and is almost fully paralysed. At first Jean-Do just wants to die, until a nurse changes his mind and he ends up writing an amazing book. This is a great example of why euthanasia should not be legal, as life is never fully over, people always have the potential to do something inspiring. However you could argue that euthanasia should be legal, because it should be the persons choice as to how they want to live their life, or not live their life, as it would be cruel to make them live their life against their will. I would highly recommend this movie if you are looking for a touching, thought provoking,tear jerking experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very interesting film, and can be seen to represent a case of whether or not euthanasia should be legal. this is due to the fact that the movie tells the tale of Jean-Dominique Bauby who was once the editor of Elle magazine,but suffers a stroke and is almost fully paralysed. At first Jean-Do just wants to die, until a nurse changes his mind and he ends up writing an amazing book. This is a great example of why euthanasia should not be legal, as life is never fully over, people always have the potential to do something inspiring. However you could argue that euthanasia should be legal, because it should be the persons choice as to how they want to live their life, or not live their life, as it would be cruel to make them live their life against their will. I would highly recommend this movie if you are looking for a touching, thought provoking,tear jerking experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Diving Bell and the Butterfly by Rico</title>
		<link>http://edubuzz.org/jburt/2013/04/26/the-diving-bell-and-the-butterfly/comment-page-1/#comment-1424</link>
		<dc:creator>Rico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edubuzz.org/jburt/?p=1542#comment-1424</guid>
		<description>This film triggers all manner of emotional and moral questions in the mind of the audience. An incredibly moving film, it brings into question the age old idea that suicide or assisted suicide is morally wrong in every situation. Jean-Dominique Bauby&#039;s situation meant that life was no longer experienced in the way commonly experienced by the rest of humanity but smothered and detached from those around him. Living as he kew it was over and the rest of his hospitalised life was mainly comprised of suffering and frustration at being unable to express himself. Initially he wanted to kill himself but as the film progressed he focuses more of his attentions towards the writing of his book and becomes more engrossed in that . However, I believe that given the option, Bauby would have committed suicide. The only reason he didn&#039;t was simply because he was unable to because of our hypocritical political system. For a society that preaches equality and freedom, it seems rather backward to deny someone the right to do what they want with their body. Therefore, I believe that people like Bauby should be given the option of euthanasia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This film triggers all manner of emotional and moral questions in the mind of the audience. An incredibly moving film, it brings into question the age old idea that suicide or assisted suicide is morally wrong in every situation. Jean-Dominique Bauby&#8217;s situation meant that life was no longer experienced in the way commonly experienced by the rest of humanity but smothered and detached from those around him. Living as he kew it was over and the rest of his hospitalised life was mainly comprised of suffering and frustration at being unable to express himself. Initially he wanted to kill himself but as the film progressed he focuses more of his attentions towards the writing of his book and becomes more engrossed in that . However, I believe that given the option, Bauby would have committed suicide. The only reason he didn&#8217;t was simply because he was unable to because of our hypocritical political system. For a society that preaches equality and freedom, it seems rather backward to deny someone the right to do what they want with their body. Therefore, I believe that people like Bauby should be given the option of euthanasia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
