Barry Smith - Learning about Learning

Thinking about thinking Conference - Feuerstein

March 2nd, 2007 · 2 Comments

 brain2.jpg

I was lucky enough to be given the opportunity to attend this Inter-Authority conference on Thursday.  The focus was the position of thinking skills and the explicit teaching of thinking skills within a Curriculum for Excellence.  Authorities showcased what was happening in their area in relation to teaching thinking skills in nursery, primary and secondary schools.  

I attended Scottish Borders session on Feuerstein’s Instrumental enrichment.  This is a theory and set of teaching techniques based on the premise that the fundamental structure of the brain is modifiable (structural cognitive modifiability) and therefore patterns of behaviour and thinking are also modifiable.  Nothing ground-breaking there I hear you say, and yes I’d agree, I think it is widely accepted now that the structure and connections within the brain are a lot more malleable than was thought in years gone by.  What instrumental enrichment and mediated learning experience purport to do is give us the tools to do this.  On first hearing it sounded a bit like brainwashing to me but once I got past that initial knee-jerk reaction to the language and tried a couple of tasks I began to see what it was about.  The idea is relatively simple in that it helps thinking skills by using techniques to identify patterns, categories and connections.  In a nutshell developing metacognition. learning how to learn.

A number of teachers were trained in this way of thinking, teaching and learning just over two years ago and every probationer teacher in Scottish Borders has been trained in mediated learning experience techniques.  I was impressed by the team’s presentation and the principles and practice espoused by Feuerstein.  Several attendees mentioned the language(, instrumental enrichment etc) involved as being a potential barrier, but those who are working with the Feuerstein techniques on a regular basis said they did not find this.  I’m not sure, I’d like to see it in action, although Feuerstein had a great deal of success working with Jewish youngsters who had undergone traumatic experiences at an early age during the second world war.

The training is not inexpensive and this may be part of the reason that it has not been embraced by more authorities but I’m going to do my best to find out more.  I can see an immediate place for techniques of this kind in helping some of our more troubled youngsters become more emotionally literate, as well as equipping them with thinking tools to tackle situations from multiple viewpoints, a skill which is vital for maintaining positive interpersonal relationships.  Learning how to learn is a skill that has applications regardless of academic ability and therefore it seems to me that there is great scope for teaching thinking skills explicitly to all youngsters.  Brian Boyd, the keynote speaker at the conference spoke passionately about developing thiinking skills in our young people, and staff, and what that could mean for Scottish education. More of this in my next post. 

Tags: A Curriculum for Excellence · Thinking skills

2 responses so far ↓

  • Alan Coady // Mar 3rd 2007 at 11:27 am

    Thanks, Barry for two fascinating posts – this and Thinking About Thinking. I too, experience problems with the language – especially the word “instrument” as in “instrumental enrichment.” I can’t imagine that I am the only person for whom this word would initially conjure up an object or some kind of apparatus. From what I understand by following the link, it is a process (curriculum) rather than a tangible noun. Do you think this is possibly the result of translation? Whatever the reason, there’s plenty of food for though in what you write and the in links provided.

    As a matter of interest, did you seek out the conference under your own volition or was it opened up to promoted staff? I don’t recall seeing anything about it in the normal channels (staff bulletins etc.) and wonder if I simply missed it or if such interesting events simply do not reach our end of the food chain.

    I have noticed that whenever I come across a new word, I tend to remember where I saw it. I will forever recall your post as the place I first saw the word “modifiability.”

  • Barry // Mar 3rd 2007 at 1:39 pm

    Alan, thanks for the comment. I was given the opportunity to go to the conference probably as a result of the thinking skills work that we are doing with the ALPs gruop at PLHS. There were a coulpe of represenatives from East Lothian. Unfortunately it wasn’t open to all and that’s also why I felt it was important to share some of the content. It was a very motivating and enlightening experience.

    In terms of the question of ‘instrumental enrichment’, the instruments are methods or techniques rather than tangible items as you say, examples of which are ‘organization of dots’(identifying pattern/systems), ‘identfying emotions’ and ‘learning to question’. As I said, my understanding is very limited, but I’m intrigued by what I have heard and read.

    The language I can see being a barrier, especially for those who had not been trained and were maybe just hearing other professionals discuss it. However, I think that it would be worthwhile tying to investigate how we could perhaps use the principles in ‘plain english’ without losing the message, method and essence of the theory.

Leave a Comment

Powered by WP Hashcash

Bad Behavior has blocked 38 access attempts in the last 7 days.

FireStats icon Powered by FireStats